‘Dems have NO policy, just sheer LAZINESS’: John Hayward’s thread on Trump pulling troops from Syria a definite MUST read
Trump pulling troops from Syria has been controversial at best, and many people on both the Left and the Right have been concerned, angry, outraged, you name it. There are some talking heads saying this move will be far more damaging to Trump’s presidency than even the fake impeachment nonsense Democrats have been pushing for three years.
Breitbart’s John Hayward put together a pretty eye-opening thread on Trump’s decision in Syria and it’s definitely worth a read.
Three key questions about Syria no one seems to be asking or answering:
1. Are the Turks lying about the security threat from Syrian Kurds?
2. Were the Turks going to attack even if U.S. troops remained?
3. Was the U.S. expected to garrison that part of Syria forever?
96 people are talking about this
A great deal hinges on question 1. If the Turks are lying about the Syrian Kurdish YPG working with the terrorist PKK, then they've perpetrated a massive fraud to justify invading another country and ethnically cleansing part of its territory.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
If that's the case, Turkey has committed one of the worst crimes against the international community in recent memory. NATO membership should be revoked and regime change in Ankara should be on the table. Turkey should be removed from every U.N. committee.
17 people are talking about this
It is Turkey we’re talking about, after all.
NATO absolutely cannot countenance one of its members conducting an ethnic cleansing campaign and killing a large number of people, including civilians, in an aggressive war on foreign soil launched under false pretenses. It's an attack on the charter purpose of the organization.
18 people are talking about this
The United Nations should view Recep Erdogan on the same level as Slobodan Milosevic in that scenario. His actions would be a clear violation of numerous U.N. charters. He would have jeopardized the international fight against ISIS over a paranoid delusion.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
So it’s really the United Nation’s responsibility …
No one in the international community is taking any of those steps. NATO just repeated that Turkey's membership is not in jeopardy. The U.N. is not holding emergency sessions to condemn Erdogan and begin war crimes prosecutions.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
Shocker.
I have not heard any U.S. critic of President Trump's withdrawal of troops accuse the Turks of lying about the YPG. That should be Item Number One in their critique of Trump's policy, but it isn't. Some of those critics sit on congressional intel committees.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
If the Turks are NOT lying about the YPG, then keeping U.S. troops in place to prevent Turkish action against a real security threat would be tantamount to America shielding terrorists while they conduct operations against a NATO ally.
17 people are talking about this
Turkish accusations against the YPG predate the Syrian civil war. The Turks have been loudly warning for years that they would take action to secure the Syrian border region if an agreement could not be reached with U.S. assistance to resolve the security threat.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
There was plenty of time to thoroughly investigate Turkey's allegations and come up with a solution short of war if they were true. That effort should have involved all parties invested in northeastern Syria - NATO, UN, EU. It should have involved U.S. agencies and Congress.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
Congress.
No way.
If the determination was reached that Turkey's accusations were invalid, all of those entities should have warned Turkey in unison that an invasion would be met with combined military force plus expulsion from NATO. What matter on NATO's table is more serious at the moment?
See John Hayward's other Tweets
The Democrats should have stopped wasting America's time with their impeachment role playing game and actually DONE THEIR DAMN JOBS by authorizing military force against Turkey. That signal to Erdogan would have been unmistakable.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
But ORANGE MAN BAD, John.
And if thorough investigation proved the Turkish allegations against the YPG were not without merit, then in what sane world was the solution to keep a handful of American troops standing in the way forever, without any formal accusations against Turkey for slandering the YPG?
See John Hayward's other Tweets
That's not a coherent policy - it's sheer laziness. It's every international organization abandoning its duties, its very PURPOSE, and settling back for a nice long nap because the Americans will take care of everything.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
It’s what Americans have been doing for decades so … yeah.
The U.N. fritters away vast sums of money on trivia, spends days fooling around with teenage climate activists, blasts out globalist propaganda, and finds 20 reasons a day to condemn Israel. It couldn't be bothered to condemn Turkey for lying about the YPG and gearing up for war?
19 people are talking about this
Question 2 is also important. If Turkey could no longer be dissuaded from carrying out the invasion they warned they were ready to undertake, then either our people in NE Syria would have been risking their lives for nothing, or they'd be the tripwire for war with Turkey.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
The U.S. was not ready to fight that war, not without grueling casualties. We have a lot of people based in Turkey, and we heavily depend on one of their airbases, which has U.S. nuclear weapons. What happens to the people and equipment if we're suddenly shooting at Turks?
15 people are talking about this
Welp, this just got way more complicated.
The Turks are sending every conceivable signal that they were absolutely determined to launch their operation and are loudly stating nothing will stop them from completing it. Sure, actions don't always match words, but every bit of data we have suggests they meant business.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
People are laughing at Trump for sending that "don't be tough guy" letter to Erodgan and him throwing it away and launching the invasion that afternoon. Erdogan's behavior suggests he was determined to move, whether or not 20 or 50 U.S. soldiers stood in his way.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
This editor kinda sorta loved that letter. Oh sure, it wasn’t exactly presidential but it was definitely entertaining and got Ergodan’s attention.
The U.S. tried to work out a safe zone deal with Turkey and the Syrian Kurds for a long time. The negotiations fell apart. Nothing satisfying to Turkey could be arranged. The Turks loudly and clearly signaled they would take matters into their own hands. The clock ran out.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
Question 3 is important because if U.S. troops weren't going to garrison that part of Syria forever, the Kurds were eventually going to have to make their peace with Bashar Assad, who is firmly seated in Damascus for the rest of his life thanks to Russia.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
Like it or not, the Assad regime is the government of Syria. The U.S., EU, and NATO did not go to war in Syria to prevent it. Russia DID go to war in Syria to make it happen. It is a fact on the ground. The last pockets of rebellion are being brutally exterminated.
See John Hayward's other Tweets
If only Trump could explain his actions in this way, right? Hayward’s thread definitely gives you more to think about and consider than just the notion that Trump has deserted our allies and friends. There is much more here than we realize … Tweets for thought?
‘Dems have NO policy, just sheer LAZINESS’: John Hayward’s thread on Trump pulling troops from Syria a definite MUST read
![‘Dems have NO policy, just sheer LAZINESS’: John Hayward’s thread on Trump pulling troops from Syria a definite MUST read]()
Reviewed by Your Destination
on
October 17, 2019
Rating:
No comments